A large number of property owners have been complaining that they have not been able to sell or pledge their properties ever since the Srirangam temple authorities raised ownership claim in 2004. | Photo Credit: M. MOORTHY The simmering property ownership dispute between the Sri Ranganathaswamy Temple administration and a section of residents in the temple town is likely to emerge as a key poll issue in the Srirangam Assembly constituency in the run up to the election. The long-drawn out dispute has been a major concern for several residents in the urban segment of Srirangam constituency for several years now as the temple authorities have been claiming ownership rights over 329 acres around the temple as per an old Title Deed 1027. A large number of property owners have been complaining that they were not able to sell or pledge their properties ever since the temple raised the claim in 2004. The property owners claim that they purchased the lands and pattas had been issued through settlements reached at different points of time in the past. They maintained that as per the Inam Fair Register of 1864 only land within the first four prakaras around the temple was treated as temple poramboke and the land between the fourth and seventh prakaras was classified as village site poramboke. Although a section of residents has moved the Supreme Court over the issue, a recent order of a district court holding that a group of property owners, which had sought pattas for properties, had no right to claim ownership over the adimanai (tenant holdings) has heightened the apprehensions of the residents in the temple town. The court had ordered that the lands should be handed over to the temple within three months. Residents resent the failure of successive governments to resolve the vexed issue and say it will be one of the important issues at least in the urban segment. “It is a matter of grave concern that the issue has not been resolved for several years now. We regret that the matter which affects a large segment of people has been neglected by successive governments. Even though the issue is before the courts, political intervention and an administrative decision can bring about a permanent solution to the problem,” said Suresh Venkatachalam, president, Srirangam Nagara Nala Sangam. Dispute in Tiruvanaikovil A similar dispute has cropped up between a group of residents of Tiruvanaikovil and Sri Jambukeswarar Akilandeswari Temple authorities in recent years. The residents are up in arms against the temple Executive Officer’s reported communication to the Registration Department in September 2023 requesting the Srirangam Sub Registrar not to register property transactions relating to certain survey numbers at Vellithirumutham village, which spreads from Srirangam to Tiruvananaikovil in the island town situated between the Cauvery and the Kollidam. The affected residents have now organised themselves as Tiruvanaikovil Adimanai Urimaiyalar Koottamaippu and petitioned the district administration seeking the revocation of the communication from the temple administration to the Sub-Registrar and resumption of property registrations in Thiruvanaikovil. “Ours is a slightly different issue as the lands were given as ‘mannar maniyam’ hundreds of years ago. The stalemate over the issue has caused deep resentment among the residents and it will echo in the elections. We will support those who come forward to support us in resolving the issue,” said M. Mari alias Padmanabhan of Tiruvanaikovil. Published – March 21, 2026 06:55 pm IST Share this: Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email More Click to print (Opens in new window) Print Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon Click to share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky Like this:Like Loading... Post navigation Ajit Pawar’s nephew files complaint in Bengaluru against air crash; says Maharashtra police refused to file FIR RCB acquired by consortium for ₹16,600 crore