Rajya Sabha MP Priyanka Chaturvedi. File | Photo Credit: ANI Shiv Sena (UBT) Rajya Sabha MP Priyanka Chaturvedi on Friday (March 13, 2026) termed the Supreme Court’s latest directions over a Class 8 textbook chapter referring to “corruption in judiciary” as “judicial overreach”. She urged the government to ensure that all three branches of governance — the legislature, executive, and judiciary — remain equal under the law and open to scrutiny. Last month, the Supreme Court imposed a blanket ban on the Class 8 Social Science textbook brought out by the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) that carried the controversial chapter. On Wednesday (March 11), the court expressed dissatisfaction with what it described as a “laconic” affidavit submitted by the NCERT. It then directed the education body to “disassociate” from the three-member Textbook Development Team that drafted the chapter and barred the members from holding any future role funded fully or partially by public money. Speaking in the Rajya Sabha, Ms. Chaturvedi said the judiciary’s initial decision to ban the chapter was understandable if it felt unfairly targeted. “Up to that point, we felt it was fine,” she said. “But the matter did not end there. Those involved kept pushing it further, saying that if anyone criticises on social media, the Supreme Court will take action.” Editorial | Selective outrage: on Supreme Court and NCERT textbook She noted that the NCERT had already apologised, yet the punitive directions continued. Raising the example of alleged corruption involving Justice Yashwant Varma, she said corruption allegations across public institutions, from politicians to the police and bureaucracy, were routinely investigated, and the judiciary should not be an exception. ““… but the judiciary becomes so sensitive when there is talk of corruption…whereas here an impeachment motion was brought against a sitting High Court judge.” Last March, burnt cash was discovered in an outhouse linked to Justice Varma, then a Delhi High Court judge, prompting an inquiry ordered by the then Chief Justice of India. The judge was later transferred to the Allahabad High Court. A notice seeking his removal moved by the Opposition remains pending in the Rajya Sabha. Published – March 13, 2026 07:45 pm IST Share this: Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email More Click to print (Opens in new window) Print Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon Click to share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky Like this:Like Loading... Post navigation RS polls: 8 Odisha Congress MLAs move to resort near Bengaluru Kerala Assembly polls 2026| Fate of A.K. Saseendran hangs in balance over fourth successive bid for Elathur constituency in Kozhikode