Letters to The Editor — February 19, 2026

On fraternity

The Supreme Court of India’s oral observations, on the obligation of political leaders to foster fraternity, strike at the heart of constitutional governance (Front page, “Political leaders, officials must foster fraternity”, February 18). When holders of high office employ language that stigmatises communities, the damage extends beyond rhetoric; it seeps into administration and public culture.

The Court is right in underscoring that constitutional morality cannot remain ornamental. While freedom of speech is vital, public authority carries heightened responsibility.

Words spoken from constitutional offices bear the state’s imprint and shape institutional conduct. Clear, non-partisan guidelines on responsible public speech would strengthen democratic credibility and restore confidence in equal citizenship.

Gopalaswamy J.,

Chennai