People gather around a Lamborghini car, which collided with a rickshaw, injuring three people, in Kanpur on Sunday, February 8, 2026. | Photo Credit: PTI The investigation into the high-profile Lamborghini crash took a contentious turn on Tuesday (February 10, 2026) after the tobacco baron’s son Shivam Mishra’s lawyer claimed that his client was not driving the luxury sports car when it rammed into pedestrians on VIP Road, even as police said CCTV footage, eyewitness accounts and other evidence clearly place that he was driving. #WATCH | CCTV visuals of the Lamborghini car accident in Kanpur, provided by Kanpur Traffic Police As per Kanpur Police Commissioner Raghubir Lal, the car driven by Shivam Mishra has been seized. An FIR has been registered. pic.twitter.com/v06iFbWGgZ — ANI (@ANI) February 10, 2026 Mr. Mishra’s counsel, Mrityunjay Kumar, told reporters that the vehicle was being driven by Mohan, a designated driver employed by Mr. Mishra’s family, and not Mr. Mishra himself. “The car was being driven by the driver, not by Shivam Mishra. We will present the facts and evidence before the court,” Mr. Kumar said, urging authorities to treat the incident as an accident rather than a criminal offence. However, the Kanpur Police dismissed the claim, maintaining that the investigation so far has confirmed Mr. Mishra to be the driver at the time of the crash. Commissioner of Police Raghubir Lal told PTI that available evidence and eyewitness statements corroborate Mr. Mishra’s presence at the wheel. “An FIR may sometimes contain incorrect or incomplete details initially. During the investigation, Shivam Mishra’s involvement was confirmed through evidence, CCTV footage and eyewitness accounts,” Mr. Lal said. Senior officers also referred to videos from the spot, which appear to show bystanders and rescuers pulling a man believed to be Mr. Mishra out of the driver’s seat immediately after the impact. Deputy Commissioner of Police (Central) Atul Kumar Srivastava said CCTV footage from the site identifies the person pulled out of the vehicle as Mr. Mishra. He added that submissions made by the counsel would not influence the probe. “What an advocate argues in court does not affect our investigation. If the court seeks any clarification, all facts will be placed before it,” the DCP said further. Police teams also visited Mr. Mishra’s residence in Arya Nagar to serve a notice, but were unable to establish contact, said an official. The FIR had initially named an unidentified driver of a Lamborghini car, but it was later updated to include Mr. Mishra as the accused. Also, the car has been seized for forensic examination. The accident involving the Lamborghini Revuelto, an Italian luxury sports car that costs upwards of ₹10 crore, took place on VIP Road in Kanpur’s upscale Gwaltoli area around 3:15 p.m. SHO Santosh Gaur was removed from his post and sent to police lines. Mr. Mishra is the son of Banshidhar Exports Pvt. Ltd.’s owner, K.K. Mishra, who had been under the I-T Department’s scanner for tax-related issues. Published – February 10, 2026 11:41 am IST Share this: Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email More Click to print (Opens in new window) Print Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon Click to share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky Like this:Like Loading... Post navigation Two arrested in Hyderabad while trying to sell tiger teeth and nails Supreme Court to hear CPI(M) petition on Assam CM’s controversial video