The Golden Temple in Amritsar, Punjab. File image.

The Golden Temple in Amritsar, Punjab. File image.
| Photo Credit: ANI

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued notices to the Army, the Centre and the Central Bureau of Investigation on a petition seeking directions for disclosure of manuscripts, religious books and other articles allegedly seized during Operation Blue Star and handed over to the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC).

A Division Bench of Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Ramesh Kumari passed these directions on Monday (March 30, 2026) while hearing the plea filed by a Ludhiana resident in 2019.

The petitioner sought directions to the SGPC for the whereabouts of the religious texts, manuscripts and other articles that were allegedly seized during Operation Blue Star and given to the SGPC.

Operation Blue Star was a military operation undertaken between June 1 and June 10, 1984, against Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale-led armed militants who were holed up inside the Golden Temple in Amritsar.

In November 2019, the high court had then issued a notice of motion to the SGPC only. But during subsequent hearings, the SGPC stated that some items were returned and some articles were still in the possession of the CBI, the Centre and the Army.

Plea for list of items seized

Petitioner Satinder Singh, who described himself as a devout Sikh, submitted that during the operation, the articles were seized from the Sikh Reference Library, Toshakhana, Central Sikh Museum and Guru Ramdas Library of the Golden Temple complex.

The petitioner sought directions for the preparation of lists of manuscripts, artifacts and literature removed on June 7, 1984. He also sought directions for the preparation of a list of manuscripts, religious texts and other articles returned to the SGPC.

It was further prayed that manuscripts, religious books and other articles be restored to the libraries, the Central Sikh Museum and Toshakhana in Golden Temple Complex.

These should be made available to the public for ‘darshan’, reading and research purposes, submitted the petitioner.

While issuing notices, the high court on Monday asked the respondents to file their replies on whether they are in possession of the articles.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *