From code factories to AI orchestrators: Why engineering education must be rebuilt

India’s engineering colleges churn out approximately 1.5 million graduates annually, yet the majority of them remain unemployable according to industry assessments. This isn’t merely a statistical anomaly—it’s a systemic failure that Artificial Intelligence is now brutally exposing. As AI tools demonstrate 300-500% productivity gains with smaller teams, the question is no longer whether Indian higher education needs reform, but whether it can survive without a complete transformation.

The current crisis: Graduates without skills

Walk into any Indian IT services company today, and you’ll encounter a disturbing reality: fresh engineering graduates spending their first year—sometimes two—learning what they should have mastered in college. The National Employability Report 2024 revealed that only 45.9% of engineering graduates are employable in any sector, with a mere 18.43% possessing the skills required for software engineering roles. These numbers represent not just individual failure, but the collective bankruptcy of an education system designed for an era that no longer exists.

The traditional Indian engineering curriculum remains frozen in a time warp, emphasizing rote memorisation of syntaxes, algorithms divorced from application, and theoretical constructs that industry abandoned years ago. Students graduate having written thousands of lines of code manually—precisely the task AI now accomplishes in seconds. They’ve memorised sorting algorithms but cannot architect a scalable system. They’ve passed exams on data structures but cannot solve real-world problems or integrate AI tools into workflows.

The AI reset: From code typing to AI orchestration

The emergence of AI coding assistants and autonomous agents represents what industry observers are calling a “brutal reset.” Basic coding, testing, documentation, and data entry—the bread and butter of entry-level IT positions—are being automated at unprecedented speeds. A team of five junior developers can now be replaced by one experienced engineer orchestrating AI systems. This isn’t speculation; it’s already happening.

But here’s the critical insight: AI replaces tasks, not responsibilities. Complex enterprise systems still require human oversight for architecture, security, legal compliance, and integration. As one industry analyst aptly noted, “Claude doesn’t answer legal notices.” The demand hasn’t disappeared; it’s evolved. The market no longer needs code typists—it needs AI orchestrators, problem solvers, and systems thinkers.

This transformation creates a peculiar paradox for Indian engineering education. At precisely the moment when human skills should become more valuable—when judgment, creativity, ethical reasoning, and complex problem-solving should command premium wages—Indian graduates are the least prepared for this shift. They’ve been trained as code factories when the market needs architects and strategists.

The employability apocalypse

The statistics paint a grim picture. Of the approximately 800,000 engineering students who secure jobs annually in India, nearly 60% enter roles paying between ₹3-4.5 lakhs per annum—barely above the poverty line for skilled professionals. More tellingly, these entry-level positions are precisely the ones AI is decimating. The traditional pathway—graduate, join a services company, spend years in maintenance or testing, slowly climb the ladder—is collapsing.

The billable hours model that sustained India’s IT boom for three decades is dying. Companies are shifting to outcome-based pricing and fixed-fee contracts with AI efficiency baked in. When productivity jumps 400% with AI tools, clients aren’t willing to pay for the same number of hours. They’re paying for results. This means the absorption capacity for mediocre engineering graduates is shrinking rapidly.

Even more alarming is India’s infrastructure gap in the AI era. The country remains an “integrator” rather than a “model owner,” dependent on foreign chips and cloud infrastructure. Without urgent investment in sovereign compute capabilities, domestic AI research ecosystems, and power generation, India risks becoming what experts call a “permanent AI help desk”—servicing systems built elsewhere, with minimal value addition.

The curriculum crisis: Teaching yesterday’s skills for tomorrow’s jobs

The fundamental problem with Indian engineering curricula is that they’re optimised for a world where knowing how to code was the primary value. Syllabi remain unchanged for years, textbooks refer to outdated technologies, and examinations reward memorisation over application. Computer Science programs teach students to write sorting algorithms from scratch when they should be teaching how to select the right AI model for a business problem. Students spend semesters on syntax when they should be learning to prompt engineer, validate AI outputs, and integrate autonomous agents into workflows.

The pedagogical approach compounds the problem. Lectures dominate over projects. Theory supersedes practice. Individual work is prioritised over collaborative problem-solving. Students rarely engage with messy, real-world problems that don’t have clean solutions in textbook appendices. They’re not taught to learn continuously, adapt rapidly, or think critically about technology choices.

Faculty represent another critical bottleneck. A 2023 AICTE survey found that 65% of engineering faculty in Tier-2 and Tier-3 colleges had zero industry experience. Many haven’t updated their skills in decades. How can they prepare students for AI orchestration when they themselves have never architected a production system or worked with modern development tools?

The transformation imperative: Re-engineering engineering education

If Indian higher education is to survive the AI reset, it must embrace radical transformation. Here are essential reforms:

1. Curriculum redesign around problem-solving: Courses must shift from teaching programming languages to teaching problem decomposition, system thinking, and solution architecture. Students should spend 60-70% of their time on project-based learning addressing real-world challenges. Introduce mandatory courses on AI literacy, prompt engineering, tool integration, and validating AI-generated outputs from the first year itself.

2. Continuous learning as core competency: The half-life of technical skills has shrunk to 2-3 years. Curricula must teach students how to learn, not what to learn. Replace static syllabi with dynamic modules that evolve quarterly. Emphasize meta-skills: how to evaluate new tools, how to self-teach, how to adapt rapidly to technological shifts.

3. Industry-academia integration mandate: That 30% of instruction comes from active industry practitioners. Require students to complete substantial internships (minimum six months) during their programs. Create industry advisory boards that review and update curricula annually, not quinquennially.

4. Faculty transformation: There should be institute mandatory industry immersion programs for faculty. Create pathways for industry professionals to teach without navigating byzantine academic bureaucracies. Incentivise faculty based on student outcomes and industry partnerships, not just publications.

5. Assessment revolution: Abolish exams that test memorisation. Replace them with portfolio-based assessments where students demonstrate problem-solving abilities. Evaluate capacity to work with AI tools effectively, not ability to write code without them. Grade collaboration, communication, and critical thinking alongside technical competence.

6. Infrastructure and ecosystem building: Universities must invest in AI infrastructure, high-performance computing resources, and partnerships with AI platform providers. Create innovation labs where students can experiment with cutting-edge tools. Build connections to startups and research institutions.

7. Interdisciplinary integration: The future demands T-shaped professionals: deep technical skills combined with understanding of business, design, ethics, and domain knowledge. Engineering programs should mandate courses in business fundamentals, design thinking, ethics in AI, and domain-specific applications.

The strategic imperative

The AI transformation presents both existential threat and unprecedented opportunity for Indian higher education. The threat is clear: continue producing unemployable graduates for disappearing jobs, watching enrollments collapse and institutions close. The opportunity is equally stark: produce a generation of engineers capable of orchestrating AI, solving complex problems, and creating value in ways machines cannot replicate.

This requires more than incremental reform—it demands a complete rethinking of what engineering education means. Universities must ask not “what should engineers know?” but “what must engineers be capable of doing?” The answer isn’t writing code; it’s identifying problems worth solving, architecting solutions, orchestrating AI tools, ensuring quality, and taking responsibility for outcomes.

The complacency that sustained Indian engineering education through decades of IT services boom is now its greatest liability. As junior roles vanish and body-shopping models collapse, only institutions that radically reinvent themselves will survive. The question isn’t whether AI will transform higher education—it’s already happening. The question is whether Indian universities will transform themselves before it’s too late.

The brutal truth is this: Indian engineering education can either embrace a painful reset now or face violent obsolescence later. The choice, uncomfortable as it may be, remains ours to make.

(Subba Rao Ghanta, Former Secretary to the Government of Andhra Pradesh)

(Sign up for THEdge, The Hindu’s weekly education newsletter.)