A view of the Supreme Court of India. | Photo Credit: File Members of Denotified, Nomadic and Semi-nomadic Tribe (DNT) communities have approached the Supreme Court of India, seeking directions that their communities be enumerated distinctly in the 2027 Census with a specific question for this in the forms. The petitioners have pointed out that since the formation of the Republic, their communities have never been counted in any of the Censuses, arguing that the absence of this data has led to community members being unable to avail government benefits and other affirmative action in their “collective interest”. The petitioners, led by Dakxinkumar Bajrange, a DNT community leader in Gujarat, have sought specific directions from the court to the Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India to include a specific question on the DNTs in both phases of the 2027 Census, which are the houselisting phase and the population enumeration phase. Published – March 16, 2026 01:17 am IST Share this: Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email More Click to print (Opens in new window) Print Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon Click to share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky Like this:Like Loading... Post navigation Jaishankar hails talks with Iran to open Strait of Hormuz, says no “blanket arrangement” for Indian-flagged ships: report Kejriwal, Sisodia move SC seeking change of judge in excise policy case