The judge recorded the “genuine” anguish expressed by counsel for the accused Aman that the bail plea had remained pending for 25 months before the trial court despite an early hearing request | Photo Credit: The Hindu Expressing concern over the prolonged pendency of a bail plea, the Delhi High Court has granted bail to an accused who has been in custody since October 2021, observing that keeping bail applications pending for inordinately long periods amounts to trauma and violates fundamental rights. In an order passed on February 12, Justice Girish Kathpalia observed, “it is a matter of serious concern that bail applications remained pending for such inordinately long period before the Court of Sessions as well as this court”. The court noted that the application in the present case was first listed on December 20, 2024, before a predecessor bench and was thereafter adjourned before different benches. It came up before the present judge for the first time only now. The judge recorded the “genuine” anguish expressed by counsel for the accused Aman that the bail plea had remained pending for 25 months before the trial court, despite an early hearing request, and continued to remain undecided even before the High Court. Mr. Aman is one of the accused in a case of fatally stabbing one person and injuring another during a sudden quarrel in 2021. Counsel for the accused submitted that he has been in custody since October 24, 2021, and argued that the incident occurred in the spur of the moment. The Additional Public Prosecutor, opposed the bail plea. However, the prosecution conceded that all public witnesses had already been examined, and therefore there was no likelihood of the accused tampering with evidence if released. “It has been repeatedly observed in plethora of judicial pronouncements that whether it be allowed or be dismissed, a bail application should not remain pending for such long periods. For, that in itself is a trauma for the incarcerated accused and violation of his fundamental rights,” the court observed. “Considering the above circumstances, I do not find any reason to further deprive liberty to the accused/applicant. Therefore, the bail application is allowed and accused/applicant is directed to be released on bail subject…,” the court ordered. Published – February 15, 2026 04:49 am IST Share this: Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email More Click to print (Opens in new window) Print Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon Click to share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky Like this:Like Loading... Post navigation Is it okay to be ambitious? Whose road is it anyway?