The move to digital evaluation does not alter academic standards. Instead, it strengthens fairness by reducing inconsistencies and improving transparency. | Photo: iStock/ Getty Images Every year, when Class 12 results are declared, the country holds its breath. For students, the numbers represent possibility. For parents, reassurance. For schools, validation. Behind these results lies an enormous exercise of trust; trust in fairness, accuracy and consistency. The Central Board of Secondary Education’s decision to move toward fully digital evaluation marks an important moment in strengthening that trust. By shifting to on-screen marking and phasing out post-result verification requests, the system signals greater confidence in accuracy and transparency from the very first evaluation. System evolving to match scale This is a significant change. For decades, answer sheets travelled physically across evaluation centres. Teachers worked through stacks of scripts under intense timelines. Moderation required coordination across locations. Even with great care, delays and discrepancies were difficult to eliminate at scale. Digital evaluation addresses many of these challenges. Scripts can be securely scanned and distributed. Marking schemes can be standardised across evaluators. Moderation becomes more consistent. Result timelines can be streamlined. For students, this promises fairness and predictability. For institutions, it strengthens credibility. Most importantly, it signals a system evolving to match the scale and expectations of modern India. Yet meaningful reform in education is never only about technology. Evaluation remains a human process anchored in professional judgment. Teachers interpret answers, assess reasoning and apply marking standards with care and expertise. Digital platforms may change the medium, but they do not replace the educator’s role. Instead, they make that role even more central to ensuring consistency and fairness. Why preparedness matters For many experienced teachers, marking answer sheets on screen represents a shift in practice. Reading responses digitally, annotating electronically and navigating evaluation software require orientation and time to become intuitive. Without adequate training and support, the transition may feel procedural rather than empowering. Teacher readiness must therefore be seen as foundational to the reform. Training should go beyond technical instructions. Evaluators need clarity on digital marking protocols, moderation tools and quality assurance processes. They must feel confident in the system and assured that technology supports their professional judgment rather than monitors it. Equally important is the emotional dimension of change. Educators who have spent decades working within paper-based systems deserve the time and support to adapt. When teachers feel prepared and respected in the transition, adoption becomes thoughtful rather than mechanical. Students and parents, too, will need reassurance. The move to digital evaluation does not alter academic standards. Instead, it strengthens fairness by reducing inconsistencies and improving transparency. Understanding this distinction will be key to building trust in the new system. Over time, digital evaluation can enable stronger moderation practices, better audit trails and improved reliability in high-stakes assessments. But its success will depend on careful implementation and sustained capacity building. India’s examination system shapes the futures of millions. Any step that strengthens fairness and credibility is a welcome one. The shift to digital evaluation reflects both administrative modernisation and a deeper commitment to trust. Technology can enable this transformation. Teachers will make it meaningful. If we invest in training, infrastructure and stakeholder confidence, digital evaluation can do more than accelerate results. It can strengthen faith in the integrity of a system that carries enormous weight in young lives. The reform has begun. Preparedness will determine its promise. (This author is the Chairperson of Dharav High School; Pro-Vice Chairperson of DPS International Gurugram and DPS 45) (Sign up for THEdge, The Hindu’s weekly education newsletter.) Published – February 25, 2026 06:00 pm IST Share this: Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email More Click to print (Opens in new window) Print Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon Click to share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky Like this:Like Loading... Post navigation In Focus podcast | Can Mumbai lead India’s clean energy transition while battling climate risks? Why number of fake universities in India rose by 60% in three years