Image used for representation | Photo Credit: Getty Images/iStockphotos A Mumbai court has discharged the former woman vice principal of a law college here in a 2007 case about the alleged use of a forged B.A. degree to get admission in the institution, noting there is no material to remotely suggest she tampered with the document. The charge-sheet against the accused advocate is filed with the “presumption” that she prepared a false document. There is no sufficient evidence to frame the charges against her, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Esplanade court) Vinod Ramrao Patil said in the judgment on February 9. The prosecution alleged that Chitra Salunkhe used a forged Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) degree while taking admission in the L.L.B. and L.L.M. courses in Siddharth Law College. Ms. Salunkhe, then being the college’s vice principal, submitted a false and forged certificate to get admission. She did not pass the BA examination and hence committed cheating and forgery, the police charged. The case had led to her termination as vice-principal of the college. Mr. Salunkhe, through her lawyer, contended that the allegations against her were groundless. Some high-ranked police officers falsely implicated her in the crime, she submitted. The defence also highlighted a report by a former DGP, which suggested Ms. Salunkhe had been harassed and prosecuted over the years by colleagues based on her gender and caste. The court noted that the investigation officer failed to produce or seize the alleged forged degree certificate. “There is no material on record to remotely suggest that the accused has tampered the document,” it said. The charge-sheet against the accused is filed “with the presumption that the accused prepared a false document”, the court observed. “It is settled law that while dealing with the discharge application, when the two views are equally possible, and the judge is satisfied that evidence adduced before him giving rise to some suspicion but not grave suspicion against the accused, he will be fully within his right to discharge the accused,” the Magistrate said. While accepting the discharge plea, the court also pointed out that the charges against the accused were not proved in the departmental inquiry. Published – February 15, 2026 12:50 pm IST Share this: Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email More Click to print (Opens in new window) Print Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon Click to share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky Like this:Like Loading... Post navigation After Dhaka power shift, BNP eyes new ties with Modi How traditional matchmaking still works in India