At fourteen, a child sits in lecture halls at the Indian Institute of Science, auditing undergraduate, graduate, and doctoral courses alongside students twice his age. His professors don’t treat him as a prodigy to be marvelled at, but as another mind engaged in the work. How does a child go from primary school worksheets to graduate-level Mathematics in just a few years? The answer has less to do with acceleration than with finding the right kind of community. In most classrooms, Mathematics moves at a carefully calibrated pace. Concepts are introduced, practised, tested, and then left behind as the class advances together. For most students, this structure provides reassurance and clarity. But for a small group of children, or those far ahead of the curriculum or deeply absorbed by Mathematical thinking, the same structure can feel oddly constraining. These children are not necessarily the ones who score highest on tests or race through worksheets. Often, they are the ones who linger over questions, ask why a method works, or try to push a problem beyond its stated boundaries. In school, such behaviour is easy to misread as distraction or restlessness. Over time, many of these students learn to disengage, not because Mathematics is too hard, but because it is no longer intellectually alive for them. As a parent, this mismatch is not immediately obvious. Good grades and positive report cards create the impression that things are going well. It is only through gradual boredom, frustration, or an increasing sense of isolation that the limits of the standard classroom become visible. A structural gap, not an individual failing The difficulty lies less with schools or teachers than with the structure they operate within. Age-based curricula are designed to serve large, diverse classrooms. Teachers are trained to bring most students to a common level of proficiency, often under tight time and assessment constraints. This leaves little room to engage deeply with students who are ready to move faster than what traditional schooling would permit. Mathematics education in schools also tends to emphasise procedures over reasoning. Students learn to apply formulas and algorithms efficiently, but rarely encounter rigorous proofs, abstraction, or open-ended exploration. For children who are curious about the underlying logic of Mathematics, this can be deeply unsatisfying. Another, often overlooked, factor is social. Being the only child in a class who is intensely interested in Mathematics can be isolating. Intellectual loneliness sets in long before academic stagnation does. Without peers who share their curiosity, such students may begin to suppress their interests just to fit in. Acceleration by skipping grades or advancing through textbooks is frequently proposed as a solution. While it can help in some cases, it addresses only the pace of learning, not its nature. What many of these children need is not simply harder material, but a different relationship with Mathematics altogether. What lies beyond acceleration For students who are deeply engaged with Mathematics, challenge is not just about difficulty. It is about encountering ideas that require sustained thought, argument, and even failure. Proof-based reasoning, where answers must be justified rather than merely computed, introduces a fundamentally different way of thinking. So does working on problems that do not have a clear solution path. Equally important is community. Finding others who enjoy wrestling with the same questions can be transformative. In such environments, Mathematics becomes a shared language rather than a solitary pursuit. Mistakes are not penalised but examined; curiosity is rewarded rather than redirected. Over the past decade, a loosely connected ecosystem of learning spaces has emerged in India to meet these needs. Often operating outside formal schooling, these initiatives bring together small groups of students for sustained Mathematical exploration. They take many forms, such as weekly gatherings, residential camps, or year-long mentoring programmes, but they all share a common philosophy: Mathematics as something to be explored, argued about, and lived with. In India, several non-profit initiatives now create such spaces intentionally. Organisations like Raising A Mathematician (RAM) Foundation run structured programmes across ages – from early exposure camps such as Epsilon India that introduces precocious children aged 9-13 to undergraduate level Mathematics and guides parents on nurturing talent and handling the emotional aspects of the child, to deeper-level Mathematics training in Raising a Mathematician Training Program (RAM TP) that enables students to make informed choices about their future, and applied Mathematics experiences like Math.Biz that connects Mathematics with economics, finance, and real-world decision making, showing students how abstract thinking translates into careers and research. Together, these programs form a continuum rather than isolated offerings. Early immersion: discovering peers and depth Arjun (name changed). encountered such a space at a young age. As a primary school student, he was fascinated by Mathematics and astronomy, but quickly outpaced the classroom syllabus. Enrichment worksheets and extra assignments did little to hold his attention. What made a difference was his first exposure to a Maths Circle. Maths Circles is a global initiative started in Russia where mathematicians work with school students and engage them with meaningful problem-solving and exploration. In India, there are about 15 active Maths Circles, out of which six are run by the Raising A Mathematician (RAM) Foundation, two by the International Centre for Theoretical Sciences (ICTS) in Bengaluru, one by IISER Bhopal, and some by other independent groups in cities like Chennai, Delhi, Nagpur, Nashik, and suburban Mumbai. For Arjun, these sessions provided his first experience of discussing ideas rather than racing to answers. In later years, he attended intensive programmes designed for younger students, including Epsilon India, which focuses on building mathematical thinking among children aged roughly nine to thirteen, alongside parallel engagement for parents. He later progressed to advanced camps such as the Raising A Mathematician Training Programme (RAM TP) and Math.Biz, which explore proof-based Mathematics and applications in economics and finance, respectively. The repeated exposure mattered: Mathematics became a long conversation rather than a series of disconnected achievements. Today, at fourteen, Arjun is auditing undergraduate, master’s and Ph.D. courses at the Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru. Continuity into adulthood For others, these early experiences shape longer trajectories. Aadityan Ganesh, who grew up in Chennai and studied at Chinmaya Vidyalaya, Virugambakkam, recalls attending residential Mathematics camps during his middle-school years, including the Vedic Mathrix programme. At grade 9, when he was asked why he kept coming back to these camps, he said, “I always thought that I was good at Mathematics. But in these camps, the problems challenged me, and I struggled to solve them. This motivated me to come back again.” What stayed with him was not a particular theorem, but the culture of questioning and argument. As he progressed through school, he continued to participate in advanced camps and later enrolled in pre-university level courses through programmes such as the Program for Algorithmic and Combinatorial Thinking (PACT) held at UPenn. Alongside this, he pursued advanced coursework in Mathematics and econometrics through independent initiatives. Today, his academic interests lie at the intersection of Mathematics, Finance, and Computer Science, and he is midway through his Ph.D. studying blockchain at Princeton. Looking back, the camps and communities he encountered provided continuity at a time when formal schooling alone might not have offered sufficient depth or direction. An alternative pathway Not all students who benefit from these ecosystems follow conventional schooling paths. Saee Patil, now around nineteen, was unschooled from a young age. This flexibility allowed her to engage deeply with Mathematics early on. From age eleven, she participated for several years in immersive Mathematics programmes, including RAM TP, and later attended international programmes such as MathPath and PACT on full or nearly full scholarships. She also audited advanced courses in Mathematics and computer science at institutions including the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Bombay, Chennai Mathematical Institute (CMI), Indian Institute of Science, Education, and Research (IISER) Pune, Cornell University, the University of Pennsylvania, and more. In the years that followed, she qualified for India’s International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) Training Camp and won medals at the European Girls’ Mathematical Olympiad. All this emerged from a long period of immersion rather than targeted competition training. Today, while she continues to study advanced Mathematics, she teaches and mentors younger students in Informatics Olympiad preparation at RAM, and inspires girls at All Girls Math Nurture Camp (an online program for girls in grades 7-10), continuing the cycle of learning within these communities. What these programmes tend to offer Despite their diversity, many of these initiatives share common features around three key elements: depth, application, and community. For depth, Maths Circles, hosted by universities and research institutes, provide regular, low-pressure spaces for exploration. Intensive programmes such as Epsilon India and RAM TP emphasise depth over coverage, introducing proof and abstraction early. For girls specifically, the All Girls Math Nurture Camp (AG MNC) provides an online space where students in grades 7-10 learn from accomplished women mathematicians. For application, Camps like Math.Biz focus on applying mathematical thinking to economics, finance, and business contexts. Interdisciplinary programmes such as Lodestone and sustainability-focused initiatives like Episteme, conducted by Pravaha Foundation, connect Mathematics with broader questions in science, design, and society. For the community, the model emphasises sustained engagement over one-off experiences. Some initiatives are fully funded, others require partial cost-sharing, but most operate on a non-profit basis with support from academic institutions, donors, or volunteers. No single organisation defines this landscape; rather, it is an evolving ecosystem shaped by educators, researchers, and parents responding to a shared gap. How parents can assess fit For parents encountering these options for the first time, the variety can be confusing. Rather than focusing on outcomes or brand names, it is useful to ask a few guiding questions. Does the programme value reasoning over speed? Are students encouraged to explain their thinking and challenge ideas? Is there continuity through mentoring or repeat participation rather than a one-off experience? Perhaps most importantly, does the environment allow children to struggle productively? In spaces where intellectual struggle is normalised, students learn resilience alongside Mathematics. A shift worth paying attention to The growing visibility of these learning communities points to a broader shift in how mathematical talent is understood and nurtured. Instead of treating interest-driven learners as anomalies within a standard system, these initiatives acknowledge diversity in learning trajectories. Universities and research institutes have begun to recognise the value of early engagement, not as a pipeline for elite outcomes, but as a way to sustain curiosity and reduce burnout. For parents of children whose mathematical interests run deep, knowing that such pathways exist can make the difference between frustration and belonging. (The author is a parent of a child who has participated in several non-profit Mathematics programmes mentioned in this article.) (Sign up for THEdge, The Hindu’s weekly education newsletter.) Share this: Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email More Click to print (Opens in new window) Print Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon Click to share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky Like this:Like Loading... Post navigation NCW team visits Telangana’s Mulugu to probe ‘sexual assault’ of 13-year-old at Medaram Jatara What is the Zeigarnik effect?